Details
General
| Morphemic form: | V{nəkuu}V |
| New orthography: | +nikuuvoq |
| Old orthography: | -nikûvoĸ |
| Sources: | [14, 6] |
| Combinations: | Click here |
| Constituents: | V{nəq}N, N{-kuq}N, N{-u}V, |
| See also: | V{sima}V, V{-riiq}V, |
| Left sandhi: | Default,
ə-eliding,
|
| Right sandhi: | Default/none,
|
| Inflection sandhi: | Default/none,
|
| Stem type: | Vowel stem |
| Diathesis: | None |
| Valency change: | Preserving |
| Valency: | None,
|
Description and behaviour
Form and usage:
This affix is a combination of abstract participle V{nəq}N, N{-kuq}N, 'former N', and N{-u}V. It is used to describe a perfective state/perfect tense, similar to one of the meanings of V{sima}V, but without the evidential aspect sense. It is less ambiguous than V{sima}V, and may hence be preferred to denote past/perfect tense, especially by younger speakers and in newer texts, whereas older speakers may tend to prefer V{sima}V: Some claim to dislike -nikuu-, because it contains N{-kuq}N, which has connotations of something old/broken/discarded. It is seemingly also a fairly new construction: it does not appear to be mentioned in dictionaries before 1997, but Fortescue (1984) also describes it.
Left sandhi:
Left sandhi is inherited from the left-most component, V{nəq}N. See this for details.
Meanings and examples
I.e., past/perfect tense (relative to the time-frame of the topic being discussed).
- Nuummiinnikuuvunga, I have been in Nuuk
[6]
I.e., I have once been to Nuuk
- Nuummiittarnikuuvunga, I have been in Nuuk (several times)
[6]
With V{ðaq}V indicating repeated occurrence.
- alinnikuuvoq, it is/has been torn
[14]
From alippaa, 'he tears it up'.
- nakorsaanikuuvoq, he has been a doctor
[14]
Or 'he was once/previously a doctor'.
- palasiunikuuvoq, he has been a priest
[14]
Or 'he was once/previously a priest'.
When used in combination with the negation affix V{ŋŋit}V.
- Qaqortumiinnikuunngilanga, I have never been in Qaqortoq