Details
General
| Morphemic form: | V{-(g)innaq}V |
| New orthography: | -innarpoq, -annarpoq, -ginnarpoq, +sinnarpoq |
| Old orthography: | -ínarpoĸ, -gínarpoĸ, -sínarpoĸ |
| Sources: | [9, 12, 11, 14] |
| Combinations: | Click here |
| Variants: | V{sinnaq}V, N{-(g)innaq}N, |
| Left sandhi: | Truncative,
/aq/ deleting,
Irregular,
|
| Right sandhi: | Default/none,
|
| Inflection sandhi: | Irregular,
|
| Stem type: | q-stem |
| Diathesis: | None |
| Valency change: | Preserving |
| Valency: | None,
|
Description and behaviour
Form and usage:
According to Kleinschmidt [9], this affix has three related meanings:
- '
Subjectjust Vb', i.e. without doing anything else, - '
Subjectalways (continually) Vb', - '
SubjectVb unconditionally'.
However, nowadays the affix is only used in the first sense, i.e. 'just Vb'ing'. It also has a nominal variant, N{-innaq}N with a similar meaning.
Left sandhi:
The affix is truncative, but it will inject an epenthetic /g/ where phonotactics require epenthesis, rather than the regular /v/. In older language and lexicalised constructions, it may inject /s/ rather than /g/ and join additively on to q-stems. Thus:
- /q/ + V{-(g)innaq}V ⇒ /qsinnaq/
This behaviour is not used nowadays, but it may be found in older texts. For example oqarsinnarpoq from oqarpoq.
According to Kleinschmidt [9], /s/ may also be injected whenever the affix is used with the 3rd meaning, regardless of the shape of the preceding stem. We record these cases separately, as the affix V{sinnaq}V.
There are also lexicalised examples of words formed with this affix, where it has deleted a final /aq/ from the preceding stem, although this behaviour does not seem to be regular nowadays.
Inflection sandhi:
Kleinschmidt [9] and Schultz-Lorentzen [11] both mention forms with reduced endings in imperative, similar to V{gallaq}V, but this is probably not used/regular nowadays.
However, these forms may be seen in older texts, so we mention them here.
The irregularities occur with imperative endings with 2sg as Subject, i.e. the endings V{-git} and V{-guk}, where the final /q/ from the stem, and the initial /g/ from the ending, are both dropped instead of having /qg/ merge to /r/ as usual.
Thus:
- V{-(g)innaq}V{git} ⇒ /-(g)innait/ ⇒ -(g)innaat
- V{-(g)innaq}V{guk} ⇒ /-(g)innauk/ ⇒ -(g)innaak
Meanings and examples
This is meaning 2.
- oqaluinnarpoq, he is always talking
or 'he just keeps talking'
- ilaaginnarpoq, he is always coming along
From {ilau}V, '
Actoris coming along'. This example illustrates the injection of /g/, which is required by phonotactics here because of the preceding [aa]. - naalaannarpoq, he is entirely obedient
[11]
- ajuinnarpoq, he is just (continuously) ill
[9]
I.e., he keeps being ill, from ajorpoq, 'he is ill'.
Also in imperative 'just Vb!'. This is merging meaning 1. and 3.
- oqaannarit, just let me know
[11]
Literally 'just say something'. Note: Schultz-Lorentzen [11] has oĸarsínait! here with the alternative /s/ initial form om q-stems, and with the reduced imperative ending -it instead of the regular V{-git}.
- iperaannarpaa, he just let it go
[11]
- tikiinnarparput, we just reached it
[9]
I.e., we only arrived there (but we did nothing there, or we did not get any further), from tikippaa, 'he reaches it; he arrives at it'.
- soraaginnarpugut, we just stopped/finished (working)
[9]
E.g. because there was nothing more to be done that day.
- tassa aallaannarpunga, that's it, I'll just leave
[9]
E.e., 'there is nothing further for me to do'.
- tiguinnaqqajaqaakka, I had nearly just taken them
[9]
From tiguaa, 'he takes it', and V{lqajaqə}V, 'nearly'.